Month: June 2016

Posted on

IMF International Economic Expert

2016 Kyrgyzstan International Monitory Fund (IMF)

IMF International Economic Expert

 

  • Public Investment Management Assessment in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • Follow up on the data request sent to the authorities in November 2015 and gather the remaining information ahead of the Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA), 2016;
  • Identify gaps in the preliminary answers to the PIMA questionnaire and gather the information (as needed) to fill in those gaps during a two week mission starting on January 29th 2016.
  • Help Kyrgyz Republic evaluate the strength of the public investment management practices through IMF’s Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA).
  • The PIMA evaluated Kyrgyz Republic’s institutions that shape public investment decision-making at the three key stages
  • Planning sustainable investment across the public sector;
  • Allocating investment to the right sectors and projects;
  • Implementing projects on time and on budget
Posted on

Kyrgyzstan, ADB, Team Leader, Project for Improving the Effectiveness of International Development Funds

2015 – 2016 Kyrgyzstan Asian Development Bank

Team Leader, Project for Improving the Effectiveness of International Development Funds

 Provide training to Government and ministries on best practices of Project Management
 Produce Development Effectiveness Guidelines and Manual for all Investment Implementation
 Producing sets of legal and regulatory acts for improved efficiency of project implementation
 Informational campaign for promoting development effectiveness
 Improving development effectiveness in Infrastructure, Energy, Education, Health and Social sectors
2016 Kyrgyzstan International Monitory Fund – IMF International Economic Expert  Help Kyrgyz Republic evaluate the strength of the public investment management practices through IMF’s Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA).
 The PIMA evaluated Kyrgyz Republic’s institutions that shape public investment decision-making at the three key stages
 Planning sustainable investment across the public sector;
 Allocating investment to the right sectors and projects;
 Implementing projects on time and on budget

Posted on

Legitimacy of Decentered Regulatory Models in the Age of Global Governance. Author Goran Sumkoski, International Journal of Global Ideas, VOL. 6, June 2016, pp.42-64

Legitimacy of Decentered Regulatory Models in the Age of Global Governance[1], Author Goran Sumkoski, International Journal of Global Ideas, VOL. 6, June 2016, pp.42-64

 

 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL IDEAS: VOL. 6 (2016, June) 42

LEGITIMACY OF REGULATION IN THE AGE OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Goran Sumkoski

Meiji University, Global Governance School, Japan
sumkoski@meiji.jp.ac

Abstract

The regulation models in a de-centered system of global governance are characterized by eroding states’ powers through the process of creation of independent regulatory agencies in charge of infrastructure regulation, something that was until not very distant past a sole and only power and mandate of the states. The analysis of the legitimacy of such regulatory models in the age of global governance is empirically tested for a set of OECD countries and separately for Bangladesh as a developing country, using data for the period between 1975/1985 and 2013. The results show that citizens in OECD countries and Bangladesh have been legitimizing their governments’ relinquishing such powers in the last several decades. The support, especially in Bangladesh, may be tentative and given in exchange not for the current but for expected
improvement of services in infrastructure since the jury is still out whether the independent regulatory agencies will deliver the promised results.

Key words: legitimacy, regulation, independent regulatory agency, global governance, developing country.

 

[1] http://journalglobalideas.com/?page_id=11